You are currently browsing the DONIGER / BURROUGHS PRESENTS: CONTENT CLASH - FASHION, ENTERTAINMENT, & ART LAW weblog archives for August, 2010.
- Uncategorized (43)
- 16. January 2012: Doniger / Burroughs Prevails Again at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
- 10. November 2011: Doniger / Burroughs Obtains $1,100,000.00 Settlement on Behalf of Star Fabrics, Inc. Just Moments Before Trial
- 22. October 2011: Doniger / Burroughs to Represent Photographer Peter Benke in Copyright Dispute with The Andaz Hotel and Others
- 27. September 2011: Law360 Reports on DONIGER / BURROUGHS victory in copyright case against Target
- 23. August 2011: New York Metro Reports on Progress of Feral Childe v. Forever 21
- 3. August 2011: Apparel News Reports on Doniger / Burroughs Victory in Fashion Industry Copyright Case
- 1. August 2011: Doniger / Burroughs - The Number One Copyright Law Firm in Los Angeles
- 29. July 2011: Doniger / Burroughs and Caribbean Blues Prevail at Trial over Target and LF USA
- 22. July 2011: Doniger / Burroughs Client United Fabrics Reverses District Court on Appeal, Prevails on Summary Judgment
- 19. July 2011: Doniger / Burroughs Client Feral Childe Fights Back against Forever 21 in Federal Court
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- January 2010
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
Archive for August 2010
Ninth Circuit Guts Big Mattel BRATZ Victory
3. August 2010 by admin.
In a decision that surely caused Barbie’s mascara to run, Judge Kozinski of the Ninth Circuit recently reversed a recent jury verdict that essentially turned the wildly popular, edgy BRATZ brand of dolls over to Mattel after finding that BRATZ was conceived by a Mattel employee.
The decision took issue with a number of decisions by the lower court, finding that the employment agreement between the employee that created BRATZ and Mattel was ambiguous as to whether the creation of BRATZ was Mattel property, and that many of the BRATZ dolls were not sufficiently similar to the early drawings and sculpts created by the artist while at Mattel for infringement to be found. In the end, the Court told Barbie to head back to the Dream House’s drawing board, and try the case again. Opinion is here: Bratz Prevail - Decision of the Court
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »