Info

You are currently browsing the DONIGER / BURROUGHS PRESENTS: CONTENT CLASH - FASHION, ENTERTAINMENT, & ART LAW weblog archives for July, 2011.

July 2011
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Categories
Links

Archive for July 2011

Doniger / Burroughs and Caribbean Blues Prevail at Trial over Target and LF USA

Breaking: In a copyright case involving the unlawful use of a fabric design, the jury has returned a verdict in favor of firm client Caribbean Blues, and against Target Corp. and LF USA.

LF USA obtained one of Caribbean Blues’ proprietary textile design by procuring a garment bearing that design from a company in Korea. LF USA then modified the design slightly, printed it on garments, and attempted to pass them off as an “exclusive” to Target. LF USA and Target subsequently sold hundreds of thousands of units of this infringing product.

The defendants’ attorneys had asked the jury to award to the plaintiff no more than $50,000.00. Clearly rejecting the defense attorneys’ arguments, the jury returned a verdict of $389,000.00 in favor of Plaintiff. This award is one of the largest fashion copyright verdicts of 2011.

Doniger / Burroughs Client United Fabrics Reverses District Court on Appeal, Prevails on Summary Judgment

In a case filed by fabric company United Fabrics alleging copyright infringement against Macys and its vendors, the situation looked dire when the district court judge dismissed the case sua sponte, finding that the copyright registration for the design at issue was invalid. Undaunted by this setback, Doniger / Burroughs partner Scott Burroughs appealed the decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Before a panel of three appellate judges, Mr. Burroughs pleaded his client’s case, noting that Macys’ attorneys had urged a misapplication of the law, and there was no evidence or precedent to support the district court decision.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals was persuaded by Mr. Burroughs’ argument, finding unanimously in favor of his client, and reinstating the case. Back at the district court level, Mr. Burroughs requested a renewed ruling on the Motion for Summary judgment that had previously been denied at the same time the case was dismissed. The judge agreed, and partially granted the motion.

As the Doniger / Burroughs trial team was preparing the matter for the jury, more than two and a half years after the case had been filed, and just one day before trial was set to commence, Macys settled, agreeing to pay a substantial six-figure sum to avoid the jury trial.

Doniger / Burroughs Client Feral Childe Fights Back against Forever 21 in Federal Court

And, the blogs take note:

http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2011/07/forever_21_faces_another_copyr.html

http://ecosalon.com/fast-fashion-giant-forever-21-steals-sustainable-label-feral-childes-design/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Ecosalon+%28EcoSalon+Main+Feed%29

http://consumerist.com/2011/07/forever-21-sued-again-for-allegedly-swiping-a-textile-design.html

http://jezebel.com/5821563/forever-21-gets-sued-for-copying–again

http://www.ecouterre.com/feral-childe-slaps-forever-21-with-copyright-infringement-lawsuit/

http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/forever-21-sued-by-feral-childe/

http://kaightnyc.blogspot.com/2011/07/support-feral-childe-not-forever21.html

http://fashionablyjust.com/2011/07/the-pot-calling-the-kettle-black-forever-21-busted-for-copyright-infringement/

http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-forever-21-rips-off-indie-designers-print/

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2011/07/is-forever-21-an-eco-fashion-design-thief-photos.php

http://www.ecouterre.com/feral-childe-slaps-forever-21-with-copyright-infringement-lawsuit/feral-childe-forever-21-1/

http://www.emcblue.com/blog/2011/07/forever-21-in-another-copyright-infringement-scandal/

http://la.racked.com/archives/2011/07/18/forever21_knocks_off_ad_infinitum.php

|